Skip to content
What Would Stoics Do

St. George Stock (modern guide) · 1850–1922

A Guide to Stoicism 4 ¶51 — St. George Stock (modern guide)

From “Ethic”

Original English text (1908)

St. George Stock (modern guide), A Guide to Stoicism 4 ¶51

From the absence of passion it is but a step to the absence of error. So we pass now to the infallibility of the sage--a monstrous doctrine which was never broached in the schools before Zeno. The sage, it was maintained, held no opinions, he never repented of his conduct, he was never deceived in anything. Between the daylight of knowledge and darkness of nescience Plato had interposed the twilight of opinion wherein men walked for the most part. Not so however the Stoic sage. Of him it might be said, as Charles Lamb said of the Scotchman with whom he so imperfectly sympathized: "His understanding is always at its meridian--you never see the first dawn, the early streaks." He has no falterings of self suspicion. Surmises, guesses, misgivings, half intuitions, semiconsciousness, partial illuminations, dim instincts, embryo conceptions, have no place in his brain or vocabulary. The twilight of dubiety never falls upon him. Opinion, whether in the form of an ungripped assent, or a weak supposition, was alien from the mental disposition of the serious man. With him there was no hasty or premature assent of the understanding, no forgetfulness, no distrust. He never allowed himself to be overreached or deluded, never had need of an arbiter, never was out in his reckoning nor put out by another. No urbane man ever wandered from his way, or missed his mark, or saw wrong, or heard amiss, or erred in any of his senses; he never conjectured nor thought of a better thing, for the one was a form of imperfect assent, and the other a sign of previous precipitancy. There was with him no change, no retraction, and no tripping. These things were for those whose dogmas could alter. After this it is almost superfluous for us to be assured that the sage never got drunk. Drunkenness, as Zeno pointed out, involved babbling, and of that the sage would never be guilty. He would not, however, altogether eschew banquets. Indeed, the Stoics recognized a virtue under the name of 'conviviality,' which consisted in the proper conduct of them. It was said of Chrysippus that his demeanor was always quiet, even if his gait were unsteady, so that his housekeeper declared that only his legs were drunk.
— St. George Stock (modern guide), A Guide to Stoicism 4 ¶51 (1908)Read in context →

Cite this passage

St. George Stock (modern guide), A Guide to Stoicism 4 ¶51 (1908)

https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/a-guide-to-stoicism/4.51

St. George Stock, Stoicism (1908), text of the Haldeman-Julius reprint “A Guide to Stoicism”. Text: Project Gutenberg #7514. Sources and licences

Read Chapter 4 in context →

In plain English

AI-written notes

The idealised wise person holds no mere opinions, never repents, is never deceived and never acts in haste or doubt, which the author calls a monstrous doctrine. The passage lightens the picture with the story that a leading Stoic could drink wine and stay so composed that only his legs were drunk.

Older wording

“nescience”
— ignorance
“dubiety”
— doubt
“eschew”
— avoid

Themes and situations

  • Judgements and impressions
  • Virtue and character
  • Self-discipline and habit

Quote cards

The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.