Skip to content
What Would Stoics Do

Epictetus · c. 50 – c. 135 CE

Discourses 1.28 ¶1 — Epictetus

From “That We Ought Not to Be Angry with Men; and What Are the Small and the Great Things Among Men”

Translation by George Long (1877)

Epictetus, Discourses 1.28 ¶1

What is the cause of assenting to anything? The fact that it appears to be true. It is not possible then to assent to that which appears not to be true. Why? Because this is the nature of the understanding: to incline to the true, to be dissatisfied with the false, and in matters uncertain to withhold assent. What is the proof of this? Imagine (persuade yourself), if you can, that it is now night. It is not possible. Take away your persuasion that it is day. It is not possible. Persuade yourself or take away your persuasion that the stars are even in number. It is impossible. When then any man assents to that which is false, be assured that he did not intend to assent to it as false, for every soul is unwillingly deprived of the truth, as Plato says; but the falsity seemed to him to be true. Well, in acts what have we of the like kind as we have here truth or falsehood? We have the fit and the not fit (duty and not duty), the profitable and the unprofitable, that which is suitable to a person and that which is not, and whatever is like these. Can then a man think that a thing is useful to him and not choose it? He cannot. How says Medea? ’Tis true I know what evil I shall do, But passion overpowers the better counsel. She thought that to indulge her passion and take vengeance on her husband was more profitable than to spare her children. It was so; but she was deceived. Show her plainly that she is deceived, and she will not do it; but so long as you do not show it, what can she follow except that which appears to herself (her opinion)? Nothing else. Why then are you angry with the unhappy woman that she has been bewildered about the most important things, and is become a viper instead of a human creature? And why not, if it is possible, rather pity, as we pity the blind and the lame, so those who are blinded and maimed in the faculties which are supreme?
— Epictetus, Discourses 1.28 ¶1 · tr. George Long (1877)Read in context →

Cite this passage

Epictetus, Discourses 1.28 ¶1, tr. George Long (1877)

https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/discourses/1.28.1

Epictetus, Discourses (as recorded by Arrian), tr. George Long (1877). Text: Standard Ebooks (CC0). Sources and licences

Read Book I, Chapter 28 in context →

In plain English

AI-written notes

We agree to what seems true to us and cannot knowingly choose what seems false, and the same goes for actions: no one chooses something they believe to be bad for them. So when someone does a terrible thing, they are deceived about what is good, and pity, as we would feel for the blind or lame, is a better response than anger.

Older wording

“assent”
— agreement with, or acceptance of, a claim
“withhold assent”
— refuse to commit either way
“Medea”
— a mythical sorceress who killed her own children to punish her husband

Themes and situations

  • Judgements and impressions
  • Anger
  • Kindness and forgiveness
  • Emotions and the passions
  • Being angry with someone
  • Being treated unfairly

Quote cards

The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.