Skip to content
What Would Stoics Do

Diogenes Laërtius · fl. 3rd century CE

Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.34 — Diogenes Laërtius on Zeno

Translation by R. D. Hicks (1925)

Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.34

Reported speech · Diogenes Laërtius on Zeno

That the Republic is the work of Zeno is attested by Chrysippus in his De Republica. And he discussed amatory subjects in the beginning of that book of his which is entitled “The Art of Love.” Moreover, he writes much the same in his Interludes. So much for the criticisms to be found not only in Cassius but in Isidorus of Pergamum, the rhetorician. Isidorus likewise affirms that the passages disapproved by the school were expunged from his works by Athenodorus the Stoic, who was in charge of the Pergamene library; and that afterwards, when Athenodorus was detected and compromised, they were replaced. So much concerning the passages in his writings which are regarded as spurious.
— Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.34 · tr. R. D. Hicks (1925)Read in context →

Cite this passage

Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.34 (on Zeno), tr. R. D. Hicks (1925)

https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/lives-of-the-stoics/7.34

Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII, tr. R. D. Hicks (Loeb, 1925). Text: Perseus Digital Library (CC BY-SA 4.0). Sources and licences

Read Zeno in context →

In plain English

AI-written notes

A dispute over Zeno's writings: whether he really authored the Republic, his comments on love, and a claim that a librarian cut out the embarrassing passages and later put them back when he was caught. Textual and reputational detail with no practical advice.

Older wording

“amatory”
— about love and sex
“expunged”
— deleted or removed
“spurious”
— not genuine

Themes and situations

  • Virtue and character

Quote cards

The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.