Seneca · c. 4 BCE – 65 CE
On Benefits 2.19 — Seneca
Translation by Aubrey Stewart (1887)
Seneca, On Benefits 2.19
You see that the actual thing itself is not of much importance, because it is not regarded as a benefit at all, if you do good when you intended to do evil; in such a case the benefit is done by chance, the man did harm. I have seen a lion in the amphitheatre, who recognized one of the men who fought with wild beasts, who once had been his keeper, and protected him against the attacks of the other animals. Are we, then, to say that this assistance of the brute was a benefit? By no means, because it did not intend to do it, and did not do it with kindly intentions. You may class the lion and your tyrant together: each of them saved a man’s life, yet neither conferred a benefit. Because it is not a benefit to be forced to receive one, neither is it a benefit to be under an obligation to a man to whom we do not wish to be indebted. You must first give me personal freedom of decision, and then your benefit.
Cite this passage
Seneca, On Benefits 2.19, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887)
https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/on-benefits/2.19
Seneca, Dialogues, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887–1889). Text: Standard Ebooks (CC0). Sources and licences
In plain English
AI-written notesA favour only counts if it was done intentionally and with good will, so a tyrant or a lion that happens to save a life has not conferred a benefit. Being forced to accept help, or being indebted to someone you did not choose, is not a benefit either, so a giver must first leave the other person free to decide.
Older wording
- “amphitheatre”
- — the arena used for gladiator and animal shows
- “conferred”
- — gave
Themes and situations
- Gratitude
- Judgements and impressions
- Freedom
- Kindness and forgiveness
Quote cards
The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.