Skip to content
What Would Stoics Do

Seneca · c. 4 BCE – 65 CE

On Benefits 6.5 ¶1 — Seneca

Translation by Aubrey Stewart (1887)

Seneca, On Benefits 6.5 ¶1

Though you have bestowed a benefit upon me, yet you have since done me a wrong; the benefit demanded gratitude, the wrong required vengeance: the result is that I do not owe you gratitude, nor do you owe me compensation—each is cancelled by the other. When we say, “I returned him his benefit,” we do not mean that we restored to him the very thing which we had received, but something else in its place. To return is to give back one thing instead of another, because, of course, in all repayment it is not the thing itself, but its equivalent which is returned. We are said to have returned money even though we count out gold pieces instead of silver ones, or even if no money passes between us, but the transaction be effected verbally by the assignment of a debt.
— Seneca, On Benefits 6.5 ¶1 · tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887)Read in context →

Cite this passage

Seneca, On Benefits 6.5 ¶1, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887)

https://whatwouldstoicsdo.com/passage/on-benefits/6.5.1

Seneca, Dialogues, tr. Aubrey Stewart (1887–1889). Text: Standard Ebooks (CC0). Sources and licences

Read Book VI in context →

In plain English

AI-written notes

If someone who did you a favour later wrongs you, the favour calls for gratitude and the wrong calls for redress, and the two cancel each other out. Repaying a kindness also does not mean returning the identical thing, only an equivalent, just as a money debt can be settled in other coin or by transferring a claim.

Older wording

“assignment of a debt”
— transferring a debt to another party

Themes and situations

  • Gratitude
  • Justice and fairness
  • Kindness and forgiveness
  • Betrayal

Quote cards

The opening line of this passage as an image, with its citation — for sharing or keeping.