Skip to content
What Would Stoics Do

Anger, fear and the mind

What would the Stoics do about overthinking?

AI-assisted draft — every quote verified against the source text. How we check quotes

AI-assisted introduction

Overthinking feels like problem-solving, but it rarely solves anything: it adds stories to facts and then argues with the stories. The Stoics paid close attention to the moment when a plain fact becomes a troubling interpretation, and they had practical ways to stop at the fact.

The situation

Every evening I replay things I said during the day: a comment in a meeting, a text to a friend. If someone replies with one word, I spend hours deciding they’re annoyed with me. I know it’s irrational, but I can’t switch it off, and I lie awake going over the same conversations.

Your situation, reframed

AI interpretation

Lying awake re-hearing your own words is exhausting, and it comes from a decent place: your mind is trying to protect your friendships and your standing by checking every exchange for damage. But it has turned into a nightly trial that never reaches a verdict. The Stoic distinction is between what actually happened, a one-word reply, and the story you add to it, that someone is annoyed. The first is a fact; the second is a judgement you can examine and decline.

The dichotomy of control

AI interpretation

Yours to act on

  • Whether you add a story to a short reply
  • Testing an interpretation before you believe it
  • Asking a friend directly if you’re genuinely worried
  • Giving the day one honest review, then letting it go

Not yours

  • How other people word their messages
  • What mood your colleagues or friends are in
  • What anyone privately thought of a comment you made
  • Conversations that have already happened

The Stoics said

Verbatim from the source · full citations

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.49

Say nothing more to thyself than what the first appearances report. Suppose that it has been reported to thee that a certain person speaks ill of thee. This has been reported; but that thou hast been injured, that has not been reported. I see that my child is sick. I do see; but that he is in danger, I do not see. Thus then always abide by the first appearances, and add nothing thyself from within, and then nothing happens to thee. Or rather add something, like a man who knows everything that happens in the world.
— Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.49 · tr. George Long (1862)Read in context →

Epictetus, Discourses 1.20 ¶1

… Good. And want of sense, what is it? Evil. Do you see then that good sense necessarily contemplates both itself and the opposite? For this reason it is the chief and the first work of a philosopher to examine appearances, and to distinguish them, and to admit none without examination. You see even in the matter of coin, in which our interest appears to be somewhat concerned, how we have invented an art, and how many means the assayer uses to try the value of coin, the sight, the touch, the smell, and lastly the hearing. He throws the coin (denarius) down, and observes the sound, and he is not content with its sounding once, but through his great attention he becomes a musician. …
— Epictetus, Discourses 1.20 ¶1 · tr. George Long (1877)Read in context →

Seneca, On Anger 3.36

… It was the custom of Sextius when the day was over, and he had betaken himself to rest, to inquire of his spirit: “What bad habit of yours have you cured today? what vice have you checked? in what respect are you better?” Anger will cease, and become more gentle, if it knows that every day it will have to appear before the judgment seat. What can be more admirable than this fashion of discussing the whole of the day’s events? how sweet is the sleep which follows this self-examination? how calm, how sound, and careless is it when our spirit has either received praise or reprimand, and when our secret inquisitor and censor has made his report about our morals? …
— Seneca, On Anger 3.36 · tr. Aubrey Stewart (1889)Read in context →

What this means here

AI interpretation

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.49

Marcus separates what he actually knows from what he adds. He hears that someone speaks ill of him; he does not hear that he has been harmed. In your case, you know a friend replied with one word; you do not know that she is annoyed. His instruction is to stop at the report and add nothing from within, which is exactly the point where overthinking begins.

Translation note: First appearances means your first, plain impression of what happened, before you interpret it.

Epictetus, Discourses 1.20 ¶1

Epictetus contrasts the care we take with money and the care we fail to take with our own thoughts. A coin-tester checks a coin by sight, touch, smell and even the sound it makes when dropped, because a false coin costs him. Yet, yawning and half asleep, we let every impression into the mind unchecked, because the harm is harder to notice. The thought that a friend is annoyed with you is one of those coins. Before you spend an evening on it, test it: what is the actual evidence, and what else could a one-word reply mean?

Translation note: Appearances means impressions: thoughts as they first present themselves. An assayer is someone who tests coins to see whether they are genuine, and the ruling faculty is your reasoning mind.

Seneca, On Anger 3.36

Seneca describes reviewing each day at bedtime: going through his own words and actions, hiding nothing from himself, pardoning himself, and resolving to do better next time. It may sound like more of the same, but it is the opposite of rumination. A review has a structure and an end; it reaches a verdict, forgives, and lets you sleep. Rumination goes round in circles precisely because it never decides anything.

Translation note: Careless here means free from care, untroubled. An inquisitor and censor are an examiner and a judge of conduct.

The passages work at two different moments. During the day, Marcus and Epictetus help you catch the step from fact to story: notice the one-word reply, and decline to add the rest until you have tested it. At night, Seneca offers a better use of the urge to go over things: one deliberate review, honest but forgiving, with a clear end. The aim is not to stop thinking about your life, but to think about it once, properly, and then set it aside.

One action for today

AI interpretation

Evening review

Tonight, give yourself ten minutes with a notebook instead of an open-ended replay. Write what actually happened today in plain facts, then what you added to those facts, then one thing you would do differently, if anything. Close the notebook and treat the day as reviewed; if a thought about it returns later, remind yourself that it has already had its hearing. If you are genuinely unsure whether a friend is upset, ask her tomorrow. If the replaying is constant and has been affecting your sleep or mood for weeks, it is worth talking to your GP.

A line to carry

“This has been reported; but that thou hast been injured, that has not been reported.”

— Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 8.49

Was this helpful?
  • Anxiety about the future

    Lying awake worrying about what might happen? Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus and Seneca on what-ifs and living in the present: verbatim, cited passages.

    Quoting Marcus Aurelius · Epictetus · Seneca

  • A public mistake at work

    Made a visible mistake at work? Marcus Aurelius, Seneca and Epictetus on getting it wrong in public, quoted verbatim and cited, with one step for today.

    Quoting Marcus Aurelius · Seneca · Epictetus

  • Being insulted or mocked

    Mocked or insulted in front of others? Seneca, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius on why an insult needs your help to land: verbatim, cited passages.

    Quoting Seneca · Epictetus · Marcus Aurelius

See all dilemmas →

Ask about your own situation

Describe what you’re facing in a few sentences. We’ll find the passages that speak to it — quoted verbatim, cited in full — and explain how they apply to you.

Ask the Stoics

Philosophy, not therapy. Your question stays private unless you choose to share it.